Showing posts with label study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label study. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Study: Entertainment Devices


Age, Gender Determine 'Go-To' Devices:
"In the 18- to 34-year-old demographic in particular, TV’s edge is slipping. Just 30% of that group said they expected TV to be their primary source of news and entertainment this year, with 28% saying it will instead be their laptop computer, and another 17% citing their smartphone."
Source: emarketer.com

Monday, March 26, 2012

Study: Top 5 Sites Visited While Watching TV


In Nielsen’s U.S. Digital Consumer Report, we were given a glimpse of the extent consumers are connected while watching TV. The world’s greatest attention magnet now meets the world’s coolest digital water cooler.What’s clear is that connected consumers are also seasoned multi-taskers. When asked what they’re doing on their devices while watching TV, the top 3 activities included:

1. Checked email - 57%
2. Surfed the Web - 44%
3. Visited a social network - 44%

The study hinted that there's still hope for advertisers, though.  19% of smartphone and tablet owners searched for product information while 16% looked up coupons or deals.

Study: Children whose minds wander

"A study has found that people who appear to be constantly distracted have more “working memory”, giving them the ability to hold a lot of information in their heads and manipulate it mentally."
"Children whose minds wander 'have sharper brains'"
The Telegraph, March 16, 2012

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Media: How Newspapers are Build Digital Revenue

Pew Research’s Project for Excellence in Journalism just released “The Search for a New Business Model,” a study “which combines detailed proprietary data from individual newspapers with in-depth interviews at more than a dozen major media companies” in order to understand how newspapers are digitally innovating or otherwise trying to stymie their rapidly disappearing print revenues.  The study reveals just how abysmal the on-going efforts of newspapers really are.


Here’s the long and short of the article:
  • Digital revenues aren’t even close to covering print losses. For every $11 in print revenue, papers brought in $1 in digital revenue. Put a more depressing way: for every $1 gained in digital $7 are lost in print revenue.
  • Newspapers don’t know how to sell digital advertising. Papers are barely selling targeted advertising. Instead, they choose (or only know how) to sell discrete display advertising campaigns. Such campaigns cannot scale to the scale of their audience and reduce the value of digital sales efforts by a factor or two.
  • Newspapers are unable to hire digital talent. The majority of executives said it’s almost impossible to hire digitally fluent sales people, due to newspapers’ bad digital repuations. Further, even if they can hire digital talent they haven’t figured out how to integrate digital sales people with their traditional sales personnel.
  • Newspapers don’t want to think about digital. A surveyed executive worries that they spend too much time working on digital, “We spend 90% of our time talking about 10% of our revenue.” A number of executives expressed concern that they have “too many people-whether it be in the newsroom, the boardroom or on the sales staff-who were too attached to the old way of doing things.”

Monday, January 16, 2012

Video: Digital Life


Digital insights to power growth, a summation of the largest global study ever conducted on people's attitudes and behaviors online.